Opinion Remember ELIZA? The 1966 chatbot from MIT's AI Lab convinced countless people it was intelligent using nothing but simple pattern matching and canned responses. Nearly 60 years later, ChatGPT ...
In a recent preprint study, researchers put GPT-4.5 to the test—not to solve complex problems or write code, but to do something far more human: hold a conversation. The results were impressive. When ...
Artificial intelligence chatbots like ChatGPT are getting a whole lot smarter, a whole lot more natural, and a whole lot more…human-like. It makes sense — humans are the ones creating the large ...
In updated tests published to the Humanity's Last Exam website, Gemini's 3.1 Pro model achieved 45.9 percent accuracy, with a ...
Hosted on MSN
Nvidia says Tesla’s self-driving is starting to feel uncomfortably human, passes a real-world Turing test
Tesla’s latest Full Self-Driving software has crossed a line many researchers once thought was years away; not just driving better than before but driving so naturally that people can’t tell whether a ...
Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights. I write about the psychology of leadership, tech and entrepreneurship. When Alan Turing asked whether machines could think, his ...
Some researchers want an upgraded version of Alan Turing’s AI thought experiment; others want it scrapped entirely. Plus, why the rate of peanut allergies might have dropped in the United States and a ...
As far back as 1980, the American philosopher John Searle distinguished between strong and weak AI. Weak AIs are merely useful machines or programs that help us solve problems, whereas strong AIs ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results